Sunday 30 October 2016

Beginning at the End

STARTING OFF BIG


Today we will attempt to address some of the larger issues in this blog series, beginning the story with a review of the most supported theories of how fauna came to disappear during the Quaternary. We will do this in the context of three species. It is really important to understand some of the main theories for faunal disappearance, in order to answer our questions. So, we will start by concentrating on two of these. Climate and people. To do this, we will assess these ideas in the context of some larger mammals of the late-Quaternary. The woolly mammoth, the straight-tusked elephant, and the European cave lion.

 


Today’s Contenders


As the sort of ‘logo’ of the Ice Ages, mammoth species are both well-known and well studied (Stuart, 2005). Towards the end of the Pleistocene woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius) were still present in Europe, and are good indicators of megafaunal disappearance. As well as mammoths we will discuss the European Cave Lion (Pantheraleo spelaea), and the straight-tusked elephant (Palaeoloxodon (Elephas) antiquus), both are fairly well documented during the late-Quaternary. All three species were residing in Europe during the Pleistocene and offer us an insight into the reason so many large animals disappeared during a geologically short period of time. The largest and most recent transition in climate occurred during the switch from the last cold phase to the present warm phase (Lister and Stuart, 2008). At around 45-50,000 years ago modern humans entered Europe (Hoffecker, 2009; Müller et al., 2011). For this reason, it is important to understand the interaction between these animals and the factors that may have caused their demise. 



  (left) Woolly mammoth calf (Maschenko et al., 2006 p.154). (centre) Straight-tusked Elephant (Diedrich, 2014 p. 274). (right) Cave Lion (Diedrich, 2011 p.210).

    














The woolly mammoth: Mammuthus primigenius


The woolly mammoth was both widespread and in recent decades has been rigorously studied by scientists. As a cold adapted species, they thrived in cool episodes when open grassland environments covered the landscape. When the climate deteriorated it is thought that this species survived in Siberia, whilst in Europe its presence continued up until the late-glacial (below) (Stuart, 2005). During the most recent glacial-interglacial cycle this animal became extinct in Europe. The difference between this cycle, and those previous, was the presence of humans as predators (Stuart et al., 2004). It is likely that they played a role in mammoth disappearance. For example, during a stadial (cool interval) that lasted between around 34 and 24 thousand years ago the woolly mammoth occupied large areas of Europe, but this extent reduced before the Last Glacial Maximum (coldest point in stadial) (Markova et al., 2013). As a cold adapted species it would be expected that this animal would not begin to decrease its population size during a favorable climate. Humans were not around during previous cycles, and mammoths survived these (Stuart, 2005). This could suggest an interplay between humans and climate, contributing to mammoth decline.


Woolly mammoth distribution until disappearance from fossil record.

(Stuart, 2005 p.172


The straight-tusked elephant: Palaeoloxodon antiquus


The straight-tusked elephant had a very different ecology to the mammoth. Their greatest range was during warmer episodes. They preferred forested areas, temperate regions, and are well recorded in the Mediterranean (Stuart, 2005). Their extinction in Europe was earlier than the Woolly mammoth, and the difference between these species, ecologically, makes this a great comparison! There is much suggestion that this animal disappeared from Europe at the onset of the most recent cold period with the move towards grassland environments (Stuart, 2005). Very recently a study in Italy has provided evidence that humans scavenged the remains of this species, in this case where the animal had become trapped, and the carcass was then exploited by the local population (Santucci et al., 2016). Though there is evidence for scavenging, and some evidence for hunting. Whether this was sufficient enough to drive this species to extinction is questionable. 



The Cave Lion: Panthera spelaea



The European cave lion became extinct during the late-Pleistocene. This disappearance is thought to have occurred at around 14,000 years ago. There are suggestions that this was due to a move towards warmer temperatures, which resulted in a reduction in open habitat (Stuart and Lister, 2011). Though, there has been proof that humans exploited these animals for their furs, as well as evidence of the hunting of these animals. It is difficult to know to what extent this affected their survival, though, large hunting events have been recorded (Cueto et al., 2016). There are alternatives to this. For instance, the loss of prey. Data gathered on cave lion diet may suggest that they had a preference for preying on reindeer whose extinction is suggested to be at a similar time to that of the cave lion (Bocherens et al., 2011). Meaning that their disappearance could be the product of prey decline, or more likely multiple factors.


In all...
Stuart (2005) makes an important point, and in fact I like this paper a lot (which you may notice if you look at the citations!). Many species survived glacial-interglacial cycles in Europe, but not the last one. So why? Today has been a brief and broad summary and discussion of the disappearance of just three of the large mammals still around in the late-Quaternary, but there are many many more!




In Summary,

?

There are still a lot of questions... & we will look at these in the coming weeks!





In the following days we will be addressing two topics! Firstly, with one of the more controversial theories of species extinction in the Quaternary, as well as beginning to look at how animals moved in and out of Europe with climate change, and if that was the only reason for dispersal (likely not)...



This has been compiled by articles i have researched. Any add-ons, article links, and suggestions for future topics would be really appreciated (especially if there is any current evidence/news)!

Cya soon!



8 comments:

  1. Wonderful and refreshing to read about a complicated topic in a simplistic, easy-to-understand way. I look forward to reading more about the theories of species extinction and migration in the Quaternary. Many thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find your blog very interesting. It is as Daniel said, refreshing not to be overcome by jargon.

    I personally think that the demise of endangered species today, could well supply some of the answers to the past and would like to hear more about smaller animals.

    Thank you!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We will be discussing smaller animals at some pint yes!

      Delete
  3. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/our-work/origins-evolution-and-futures/extinction-large-mammals-late-quaternary.html

    May be interesting to take a look

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lister has a lot of papers on this subject, great author! There are also a few attached to the page, thanks for the link!

      Delete
  4. As someone who is interested in these kinds of issues but doesn't have a thorough enough background in the truly scientific side, I highly appreciate the public, easy to read and understandable approach that this article takes. The questions which are asked by this article tackle much larger current issues and I am incredibly excited to see how the next article develops these ideas further! Will there be even more variety of the mammals covered? I look forward to reading more!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the lovely comment Hannah! There will certainly be more variety, yes! Keep following!

      Delete